← Model catalog

Seedance 2.0 Mini vs Wan 2.1 Turbo

Both models run on Tovaki under one subscription. Below is a factual comparison drawn from this site's real billing and our own integration notes.

Side by side

Seedance 2.0 MiniWan 2.1 Turbo
Served viaByteDance Volcano ArkAlibaba DashScope
Shortest shot · 720p5s → 505s → 25
Credits/sec @720p105
Longest shot · 720p10s → 1005s → 25
Shortest shot · 1080p
Available durations5–10s5s
Available resolutions480p / 720p480p / 720p
Typical generation timeabout 120sabout 120s
Templates tuned for it00

Measured limits

Seedance 2.0 Mini

2.0 family economy tier, 480p/720p

Seedance 2.0 Mini

Wan 2.1 Turbo

Cheapest video overall, fixed 5s

Wan 2.1 Turbo

How to choose

Per finished second at 720p, Wan 2.1 Turbo costs less (5 vs 10 credits/sec). Per-second is the comparable figure here because the two models have different shortest tiers (5s vs 5s).

Different duration steps: Seedance 2.0 Mini offers 5–10s, Wan 2.1 Turbo offers 5s.

Which one looks better depends on your material, and we won't decide that for you — run the same prompt through both; it costs a few dozen credits to find out.

FAQ

Can I mix them in one project?

Yes. Model is chosen per shot on the canvas, so one film can use different models for different shots.

Does switching models cost extra?

No. One subscription covers every model in the catalog; you spend credits.

Other comparisons

Seedance 2.0 vs Kling v3Seedance 2.0 vs Veo 3.1Kling v3 vs Veo 3.1Seedance 2.0 vs Seedance 2.0 FastKling v3 vs Kling 3.0 OmniVeo 3.1 vs Veo 3.1 Fast
Try bothOpen Tovaki
Seedance 2.0 Mini vs Wan 2.1 Turbo: credits, durations, resolution · Tovaki