← Model catalog

Seedance 2 vs Kling 3 vs Veo 3.1

Tovaki integration snapshot · verified 2026-08-25

A three-way decision guide using current Tovaki billing and integration facts. It compares the same measurable fields for all three models and deliberately does not invent a visual-quality winner.

Short answer

For the lowest current 720p rate, start with Kling v3 at 12 credits per finished second. Seedance 2.0, Veo 3.1 expose a 4K path. Audio is automatic on Seedance 2.0, Veo 3.1; Kling v3 exposes it as an optional ×1.5 choice. This is a cost-and-capability answer, not a quality ranking.

One comparable table

Per-second rates normalize the different minimum shot lengths. The minimum-shot column still shows the actual first legal duration and charge.

ModelVendorMinimum shot · 720pCredits/sec · 720pCredits/sec · 1080pCurrent durationsMaximum resolutionAudio in Tovaki
Seedance 2.0ByteDance5s → 10020505–10s4kAutomatic
Kling v3Kuaishou5s → 6012165 / 10s1080pOptional · ×1.5
Veo 3.1Google4s → 23258584 / 6 / 8s4kAutomatic

Scope: the endpoints and controls currently exposed inside Tovaki. A dash would mean that a tier is not exposed here, not that the vendor lacks it everywhere.

Choose by the constraint that matters

Lowest current rate

Kling v3 is lowest here: 12 credits/sec at 720p and 16 credits/sec at 1080p.

Shot length

Veo 3.1 uses 4 / 6 / 8s; Seedance 2.0 uses 5–10s; Kling v3 uses 5 / 10s. Pick the legal steps your edit actually needs.

Resolution path

Seedance 2.0, Veo 3.1 expose 4K in the current Tovaki route. Kling v3 currently tops out at 1080p here.

Audio delivery

Seedance 2.0, Veo 3.1 deliver synchronized audio automatically. Kling v3 exposes audio as an optional paid choice at ×1.5 credits.

What this page cannot tell you

It cannot honestly declare which model looks best. Tovaki has not yet published a controlled, blinded output benchmark for this exact trio. Style, motion, prompt adherence and consistency need the same input, prompt and scoring protocol; queue time also varies. Run one representative shot on all three before committing a full sequence.

Read the benchmark methodology

Methodology and limits

Verified 2026-08-25. Credit figures come from the same Tovaki pricing snapshot used before generation; durations and resolutions come from the current integration capability map; audio state comes from the production canvas capability plus its pricing multiplier. These are Tovaki integration facts, not vendor-wide promises or vendor retail prices. Values may change when the catalog is resynchronized.

Audit the source data

Download the complete public, non-test video-model snapshot used by this comparison. It includes the field definitions and null semantics needed to reproduce the table.

Open JSON datasetDownload CSV

Inspect each pair

Use the two-model pages for longer pair-specific notes and exact shortest/longest-shot charges.

Seedance 2.0 vs Kling v3Seedance 2.0 vs Veo 3.1Kling v3 vs Veo 3.1

FAQ

Which is cheapest on Tovaki: Seedance 2, Kling v3 or Veo 3.1?

At the current Tovaki rate, Kling v3 is lowest at 12 credits per finished second at 720p and 16 at 1080p. This compares credits, not output quality.

Which of the three supports 4K on Tovaki?

Seedance 2.0, Veo 3.1 expose 4K through the current Tovaki integration. Kling v3 currently exposes up to 1080p here.

Which of the three generates audio on Tovaki?

Seedance 2.0, Veo 3.1 deliver audio automatically in the current route. Kling v3 offers it as an optional paid choice with a ×1.5 credit multiplier.

Which one has the best video quality?

No defensible winner is published here. That requires a controlled blind benchmark using identical inputs and a declared scoring method; this page currently compares only auditable cost and integration constraints.

Test one real shot across all threeOpen Tovaki